90% Fully Vaccinated Portugal Declares State Of Calamity

 

Portugal falling apart as vaccine debacle proves failure:  

Costa said that "the first measure to be taken is the reinforcement of the vaccination campaign with the booster dose."

"The government has acquired in time the requisite amount of vaccine doses to be administered to each Portuguese," Costa said, adding that the country is "prepared to vaccinate eligible children."

Makes perfect sense.  Vaccine shows no effectiveness at 90% of the population fully doomed, so jab more people with ever more jabs. Make the spike proteins spew from their eyes.

INSANITY

Like the several US states, such as New York, that restricted the young and healthy and made them social distance and wear two masks, even as they packed nursing homes with covid positive people and allowed the old and sick to die by the tens of thousands. They did not allow them to die. They murdered them.

A population that sits still for this is under judgement. They have eyes and do not see. They have ears and do not hear. Therefore they line up to be injected with spike protein, which is the same material responsible for much of the pathogenesis in the virus itself.

 

"You Are Going To Go To Your DOOM"

 

 

What a pack of lies. The vaccines do not protect anyone from anything.

Highly Vaccinated Israel Is Seeing A Dramatic Surge In New COVID Cases.

Nearly 60% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Israel fully vaccinated.

Those two articles on Israel are from August 2021 when there was no omicron. 

Look where the case and death curves in Israel went toward the end of December with the advent of omicron. Both went totally vertical. Far worse than before a single soul was ever vaccinated. Where is the efficacy? Why is no one following that science? $$$?

Look at the chart for Singapore. It tells the same story. For 18 months the scamdemic killed hardly anyone in Singapore. Then in September 2021 with almost every adult in the country fully vaccinated covid deaths burgeoned. 

It was September 2021 when Singapore was hit by the first of two big covid waves that dwarf anything that came before in that nation. The more recent one that began in Jan. 2022 is worse case-wise than the first (Sep.-Nov. 2021), though deaths are lower with this latest wave in Singapore. You would expect this with a lesser pathogen or even a pathogen equal to what they have seen in past waves, as the weakest and sickest people are eliminated in initial waves and there is not an unlimited supply of such individuals.

The CDC admits that the average covid death is a person with FOUR comorbidities any one of which is capable of causing death at any time. Did they die of covid or with it? Did they even have covid at all? We will never know the truth.

Pick a nation...any nation. Compare its case/death charts to its vaccination program. This is clearly a pandemic of the vaccinated.  

$$$ is why they keep pushing the vaccines even though it is clear that they have no efficacy. This does not even get into the topic of all cause mortality, which is becoming alarming.

The CDC Director admits covid vaccines do not protect against infection and transmission.

WHO top scientist admits covid vaccines do not protect against infection and transmission.

Founder of GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunization), Bill Gates, admits covid vaccines do not protect against infection and transmission:

If you are honest, then you know these things.

If your experience is like mine, then you know a lot of people who say they were only asymptomatic because they got the vaccine. 

Do they not remember that from the start of the scamdemic 90+% of cases have been asymptomatic? How do they know that they were even infected with anything at all? How do they know that the tests being used do anything other than spit out false positives?

Here is what the vaccines are really designed to do:

Christopher Cole, Executive Officer, Medical Countermeasures Initiative with the United States FDA: 

All aboard the booster shot crazy train and there is no exit ever. 

Stephanie Seneff, Phd., MIT CSAIL Senior Research scientist:

 

Through the prion-like action of the spike protein, we will likely see an alarming increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases with increasing prevalence among younger and younger populations.

She has been debunked by Monsanto shills for her comments on glyophosphate, so if you are looking for plausible deniability to hold on to your vaccine faith I am certain you can find plenty of shill fact checkers to smooth over her vaccine comments as well.

Dr. Seneff's complete study: Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

And from the Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University in Malmö, Sweden: Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA:

There has been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination.

Did your doctor tell you about that before he poked you?

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi:

Sucharit Bhakdi was born in Washington, D.C., and educated at schools in Switzerland, Egypt, and Thailand.  He studied medicine at the University of Bonn in Germany, where he received his MD in 1970.  He was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg from 1972 to 1976, and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen from 1976 to 1977.  He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at Giessen University in 1977 and was appointed associate professor in 1982. He was named chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz in 1990, where he remained until his retirement in 2012. Dr. Bhakdi has published over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.

Dr. Bhakdi's words in the video above go hand-in-hand with what we saw in the previous post regarding the spike protein.

And more from Dr. Bhakdi:

Excerpt from Dr. Bhakdi’s and Dr. Arne Burkhardt's presentation to the Doctors for COVID Ethics Symposium:

Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs. That myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to very frequently occur in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, is self-evident.Beyond any doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death. We note that both mRNA and vector-based vaccines are represented among these cases, as are all four major manufacturers [Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen and AstraZeneca].

The Salk Institute on spike protein toxicity:

There’s been a growing consensus that SARS-CoV-2 affects the vascular system, but exactly how it did so was not understood. Similarly, scientists studying other coronaviruses have long suspected that the spike protein contributed to damaging vascular endothelial cells, but this is the first time the process has been documented.

In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.

What is the authority of the Salk Institute?

The Salk Institute for Biological Studies is a scientific research institute located in the La Jolla community of San Diego, California, US.[1] The independent, non-profit institute was founded in 1960 by Jonas Salk, the developer of the polio vaccine; among the founding consultants were Jacob Bronowski and Francis Crick. Construction of the research facilities began in spring of 1962. The Salk Institute consistently ranks among the top institutions in the US in terms of research output and quality in the life sciences.[2] In 2004, the Times Higher Education Supplement ranked Salk as the world's top biomedicine research institute, and in 2009 it was ranked number one globally by ScienceWatch in the neuroscience and behavior areas.[3][4]

And from the tinfoil hat nutters over at the American Heart Association we have this, Abstract 10712: mRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: 

Steven R Gundry

Originally published 8 Nov 2021

Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

Expression of Concern: Abstract 10712: mRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Abstract...

A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

All of the vaccines being used, whether they be viral vector or mRNA based, cause your cells to manufacture spike protein and the spike protein is proven to damage the vascular system and that means the entire body and all of its systems. 

edit: The Novavax Covid-19 vaccine is "protein based." It does not cause your cells to produce spike protein. Instead it presents a full length spike protein to the immune system in order to trigger the immune system to produce antibodies. But it still uses the spike protein and it is also tested against fetal cell line HEK 293, like the mRNA vaccines.

You Have Been Warned 

The vaccines do not:

• stop you from getting covid
• stop you from spreading covid

The vaccines do make people sick. This is why we have the ongoing psyop of variants. Speaking of variants, have you been following the farce of omicron? Nations losing their minds over a "slight cough." 

Sorry, but if you ran out and got shot up with spike protein because you bought the omicron fear porn, then you deserve to be called dumb. Anyone who is not responsible enough to do basic research before injecting poisonous trash into their body is definitely in the running for a Darwin Award.

It is the spike protein vaccines causing the problems and the problems will only increase in magnitude as the spike proteins do their work and as millions of people continue to be injected with boosters that cause their bodies to manufacture still more spike proteins.

And as more people fall ill from spike protein vaccinations destroying their bodies the screeching for everyone to be forcefully vaccinated will grow ever more shrill and desperate.

Dr. Coleman sounds good until he says "the use of these jabs must stop now... immediately, until more long term tests are done..."

That is a nonsense statement. 

We do not need any more tests to know that the spike protein is the culprit and that the spike protein is a dangerous and injurious poison. 

All of these vaccines cause your body to manufacture spike protein and further testing is ridiculous. No amount of testing will make spike protein safe in the human body. It was never meant to be.

It's like saying we need more long term testing on gun shot wounds to the head. You know...so we can determine if they are safe and effective.

So is this guy some kind of controlled opposition?

I think he is just a brainwashed pro-vaccine dupe. He still has one foot stuck in the matrix. He just cannot extricate himself fully from the propaganda he has been baptized in for his entire life as a medical professional. Maybe he cannot accept that this is no accident. It's a plot.

Dr. Robert Malone was banned from Twitter for posting the truth about vaccines that are using a technology that he invented (mRNA delivery system in vaccines):

In this second video on Vimeo Dr. Malone describes how dangerous and irresponsible it is to give these crap vaccines to children. But before he does that he states, "I am vaccinated for COVID...." So Dr. Malone is a lot like Dr. Coleman above in trying to serve two masters.

Mike Yeadon former Pfizer Vice President Allergy and Respiratory Research Division, "there is no informed consent":

Dr. Kary Mullis (died before covid19 began) on misuse of the PCR devices that he invented:

we've only just begun...to die

 

Here is comedian Bob Saget talking about the booster shot he received on December 13, 2021:

Just four weeks later he was found dead. 

How many coincidences do people need?  

He said he took the booster in the butt.

You all took it in the butt, didn't you. And you will keep taking it in the butt until you wake up and throw yourself from the booster shot crazy train.

It is now being reported that Saget died of head trauma. 

OK. Sure he did.

Here is another triple vaccinated comedian who now has head trauma (listen to her closely before she falls down):

If this does not give you pause and warning about what is going on nothing will.

Most who receive this information will not be helped by it. They have eyes, but do not see. They have ears, but do not hear. Or, like the Pharisees, they will be angered by it because they see it as a threat to their power. All this is the result of rebellion. This black magic has been poured out upon the world and the world is drunk with it.

If you be one who can see, it is an incredible spectacle, is it not?

And it causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the bondmen...

But, oh no they would never use this scam as the springboard to a totalitarian state to track everything you do. Yes they are doing it right now. 

Those police are not really under fire. This is the process of acclimating the public to the tightening of the chains. This type of abuse will become increasingly common as the manufactured outrage takes on a gradually more muted tone.

Yet the stupid public has no problem with it, as they are willing to sell all liberty for the promise of security.

And while you were focused on making sure that your mask was pulled up over you nose guess what they were pulling over your eyes:

Worldwide Social Credit Industry - Infrastructure to Support Social Credit Systems Represents a $16.1 Billion Opportunity by 2026:

• The COVID-19 pandemic has facilitated substantial interest in citizen monitoring solutions. (imagine that...)
  
• Infrastructure to support social credit systems represents a $16.1B global opportunity by 2026.
• Cameras and other optical equipment for social credit systems will reach $723M globally by 2026
• Advanced computing will be used in conjunction with AI to provide nearly flawless identification and tracking
• Various forms of biometrics will be used for identity verification as well as verifying the presence/location of people
• Starting as tangential to public safety and homeland security, the social credit market becomes mainstream by2026
• Social credit systems represent the ability to identify (mostly people but also some "things") and track activities for purposes of grading behaviors and applying "social credit" scoring. A given grading/scoring methodology depends largely on social credit system objectives and metrics.

That is a mainstream news outlet not a conspiracy site.

This is happening. Tracking everyone all the time.

MARK my words. This is global totalitarianism in preparation for a global totalitarian super state. 

All in preparation for the introduction of the global totalitarian dictator. 

The mouth of the lion who will silence all other voices.

If you have participated, then congratulations. You, your ignorance and your apathy have become the reason for our current distress. 

We will never willingly let anyone put these filthy vaccines into our bodies. We reject your lies and we reject your lab made virus to herd us into accepting your mandates and your mass psychosis. 

We will be waiting for you to come knocking in the night and the fog. We all know it is coming just like before. First they came....

 

And if you want to know what is really going on in Canada, Liberal MP Louis-Hebert Joel Lightbound - a member of PM Trudeau's own party - has the answer:

“I can’t help but notice with regret that both the tone and the policies of my government changed drastically on the eve and during the last election campaign,” Lightbound said during a press conference Tuesday. “From a positive and unifying approach, a decision was made to wedge, to divide and to stigmatize.”

In fact, it’s easy to trace the exact moment this happened during the campaign and why Trudeau and Liberal strategists did it.

They did it because numerous polls at the time showed they were falling behind the Conservatives and the Liberals determined that vilifying people who opposed vaccine mandates and passports would be better received by the Liberal base than demonstrating understanding or compassion.

Follow the political science. Corrupt and power mad politicians are at the crux of this entire global assault on human rights.

I am sure that you see this no matter what nation you happen to be in right now.

I certainly do.

First they came for the Canadian truckers...

who did not want the spike protein producing vaccines developed with aborted fetal cells (and which do nothing at all to stop covid19).

 

Watching Cambodia

 

 

Cambodia had less than 500 total cases tallied for the first year of the pandemic.

Then Cambodia's vaccination program began. 

Did Cambodia only start testing seriously in the May 2021 time frame? 

Or is something else at play here?

Many researchers were hailing Cambodia as a success for keeping its covid numbers low back in December 2020 and mass testing was specifically noted as a contributing factor in the low case rate. 

So they were most likely showing correct numbers, which were exceedingly low.

It appears to me that covid was allowed (or perhaps caused) to run rampant to drive vaccination panic. What was the CT for testing I wonder? What other anomalies? Will we ever know or live to tell?

The CT is only one of countless clues about the nature of what is happening. The CT should be public information that is easily accessible everywhere. It should be the same everywhere on earth and where it is different there should be clear rationale. But it is none of those things. It is different everywhere and good luck finding anyone who can tell you what it where you live. Most of the time they act as if you have sinned by asking the question.

It is a tool of deception and fraud.

I did not define CT in this post and that is on purpose. You have a duty to know what it means and if we are two years into this pandemic and you still don't then you have a real problem with complacency. If you are a vaccine defender and you do not know what CT is and how it is used and misused, then double shame on you.

At any rate, this is just another variation on the methodology we have seen worldwide. Fear porn, lab engineered variants and blaming the unvaccinated for what the vaccines and mad scientists are doing. Who would have ever imagined that humanity was dumb enough to fall for such a scam? Whomever is behind our leaders did.

British Medical Journal interviewed a whistle blower who alleges some Pfizer clinical trial data is the product of fraud.

This report itself is damning, but for added dimension read the responses on BMJ.

It is pointed out that Ventavia only covered 2.3% of the entire trial cohort, but it is also noted that these revelations are likely just the tip of the iceberg for many reasons that are part of systemic failures in how clinical trials are done.

Pity that it seems these revelations may have the intention of shilling for AstraZeneca.

Every one of the covid vaccines that are in use instruct your cells to produce spike proteins and the spike protein itself is a damaging toxin:

There’s been a growing consensus that SARS-CoV-2 affects the vascular system, but exactly how it did so was not understood. Similarly, scientists studying other coronaviruses have long suspected that the spike protein contributed to damaging vascular endothelial cells, but this is the first time the process has been documented.

In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.

That is the final word and if those two paragraphs from the Salk Institute do not wake you up nothing will.

And according to Dr. Byram Bridle:

The logic is too simple for most people to grasp:

Spike proteins damage the vascular system.

All covid vaccines produce spike proteins in the human body.

Therefore, all covid vaccines damage the vascular system.

Surely this cannot mean what it seems to mean? Surely the scientists have done something to mitigate harm? Surely they would not do anything to deliberately hurt us? Surely the writer of this article is just paranoid like the TV said?

Surely you cannot be that naive? 

Some can grasp where this leads us over the next few years, given the fact that billions have received the vaccines already. Finely tuned boosters are coming online.

They have been telling us for years that we use too many resources. They have been telling us for years that there are too many of us. They have been telling us for years that we are a crisis. So now they are acting against the crisis that is us.

This is not the first time that incompetence, bureaucracy and corruption were used as a smokescreen for genocide. But this time it is global in scale.

All that can be said is prepare. 

And for those of you who say you got it and you are ok, congratulations. You were in the control group this time. They are carefully studying the effect of this poison on the population. 

If you are in the group of vaccine recipients who received the experimental material, then at best your health will begin to decline. At worst you will fall over dead like so many others and your doctor will say it was a coincidence and must have been the stress of the pandemic and worry caused by the unvaccinated. 

Fortunate for the architects of this madness ~90% of humanity are dumb enough to believe it.

NIH Admits Funding Gain-Of-Function At Wuhan Lab

 

I posted it here 18 months ago. It has been lied about and denied ever since. Cockroach Fauci lied about it to Congress.

All the lying dirtbag "scientists" who are probably involved in it have been making the rounds for the last year and a half telling us it's impossible, it couldn't happen, you don't understand the science.

Now the NIH admits it:

Despite repeated denials by NIAID Director Anthony Fauci that his agency used American taxpayer money to fund Chinese gain-of-function research on bats infected with coronaviruses, the National Institutes of Health – which oversees NIAID – admitted in a letter to House Oversight Committee ranking member James Comer, R-Ky., that a "limited experiment" was indeed conducted.

We have been told for over a year by an army of stupid people that this was a conspiracy theory, but now the NIH admits that the denials were a lie. What they say now is also a lie. 

The research went much deeper than this late admission. What they are showing to us is a limited hangout.

The United States has done all kinds of things secretly and we will never know anything about most of it. The United States knows how to hide its secret programs.

NIH funding bat coronavirus gain-of-function research at the WIV in Wuhan was laid on the surface for us to find. They are leading us into a narrative. 

Fauci is an actor and so are all of the US government characters that we see on the TV.

Trump and his recently adopted right side are working to the same end.

Millions of Americans are vaccinated because of Trump and Fox News. They never would have submitted to it if the only voice telling them to do it was CNN and the Democrats.

Different propaganda mouthpieces tailor made to brainwash different groups of people, but it is all the same propaganda and it all has the same goal. 

And the orange man is really just another red.

Or did you think that Marxists are as dumb as the average person is? Did you think they only wear the face you expect them to wear? The face they have programmed you to expect? The face we are shown of DPRK, Cuba or the former USSR? 

They are chameleons and role players. They wear whatever face is suited to the moment and whatever audience they happen to be playing to at that moment.

Can Someone Point Me To The Long Term Studies?

Can Someone Point Me To The Long Term Studies on COVID19 Vaccines?

 

You know, like the kind they have always done on all vaccines since they started using vaccines?

The kind that show health effects over years and decades.

Pharmaceutical companies lie a lot and suppress negative information, but over time the truth comes out and the lawsuits accumulate. 

Eventually after years or decades bad meds get banned.

Until now...when they just cremate the evidence and pay off the press and politicians. 

They don't have to pay off the social darwinist doctors.

They already own them.

How Reliable Is The PCR Test

 

CDC is mandating a Ct of 28 and below for the vaccinated and 40 for everyone else (Yale study page 6 shows CDC lab 40 Ct). Does that sound like an honest organization to you? 

I am not going to come out and say that someone at CDC has a financial or other interest in Moderna or Pfizer. 

It's not like it never happened before:

In 2016 a group of more than a dozen senior scientists at the CDC lodged an ethics complaint alleging that that the CDC was being influenced "by corporate and political interests in ways that shortchange taxpayers." They noted "the pervasive nature of unethical practices throughout all levels at the CDC."

What does it mean? It means there are far more "breakthrough" cases than they will ever admit. Maybe even to the point that "efficacy" is null for all practical purposes.

The Plot

The PCR test is being used globally in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2.

But According to Kary Mullis (deceased), inventor of the test, there are problems with using PCR as a diagnostic tool:

In 2020 a landmark court case in Portugal ruled that four German tourists had been illegally detained due to having been declared COVID positive based upon the results of PCR testing:

In view of the current scientific evidence, this test is, in itself, unable to determine, beyond reasonable doubt, that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus...

The study referenced by the judges in the above case (and others like it) have been misinterpreted by many on social media:

Since the beginning of the epidemic,we have performed in our institute 250,566 SARS-CoV-2RT-PCR  for 179,151 patients, of which 13,161(7.3%) tested positive. Up to the end  of  May, 3790 of these samples reported  positives on naso-pharyngeal samples were inoculated and  managed for culture as previously described [8]. Of these 3790 inoculated samples, 1941 SARS-Cov-2 isolates  could be obtained after the first  inoculation  or up to blind subcultures. The correlation between the scanner values and the positivity of the culture allows us to observe that the image obtained with ten times more isolates than our preliminary work (1941 versus 129) does not change significantly (Figure 1).  It can be observed that at Ct=25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct=30 this value drops to  20%. At Ct=35, the value we used to report positive result for PCR, less than 3% of culture are negative.

This study is NOT stating that 97% of cases are false positive. These cases all have the coronavirus. It is a matter of whether they can be considered clinically infectious.

However, as the Ct increases a positive result does become more likely and in the video above Kary Mullis does state that (paraphrase) [you are likely to find just about any molecule just about anywhere if you amplify the sample enough times]. 

So what is an appropriate Ct value? 

In January 2021, when the Philippines was concerned about inbound passengers that might be infected with the UK COVID-19 variant (B.1.1.7) the DOH was using a Ct cutoff of 29:

Actually, what we were doing before was random. But of late, we checked all those who tested positive for COVID-19, those who have less than 30 CT value, they sent their specimen for sequencing. That's why we were able to find out the UK COVID-19 variant in a passenger from Dubai.

The Indian Council of Medical Research recommends a Ct cutoff of 35 in determining who is "COVID-19 positive":

All patients with a CT value of equal to or less than 35 may be considered positive, while those with a CT value greater than 35 may be considered negative. All samples with a CT value equal to or less than 35, which is seen as a poor sigmoidal curve, should be essentially retested. Implementing a CT value cut-off of 24 is not at all advisable as this would lead to missing of several infectious patients and increase disease transmission...

Health authorities should have a very good explanation for whatever Ct value they are using, especially if they are using a Ct above 35, considering this has a potentially great impact on the persons being tested. 

Dr Bernard La Scola, infectious disease scientist at IHU Mediterranee Infection-Aix Marseille University in France stated that pursuing cases with a Ct above 35 “is a waste of time to consider these rare cases.” 

The bottom line on using the PCR test as a diagnostic tool:

The RT-PCR test also appears to have its problems. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR manufacturing technique, is reported to have said that it was for research purposes only and not for medical diagnosis. An 80% false positive rate was reported from China in March 2020 (4).

The opinion of Dr. Mullis on the United States COVID-19 Task Force leader, Anthony Fauci, sheds some light on the handling of the pandemic in general:

Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera...

"They’ve got a personal kind of agenda" 

And from Principia Scientific, WHO admits high Ct produces false positives:

In August of last year, The New York Times published an article stating that as many as 90% of COVID-19 tests in three states were not indicative of active illness (archive). In other words, they were picking up viral debris incapable of causing infection or being transmitted because the cycle threshold (Ct) of the PCR testing amplified the sample too many times.

Labs in the United States were using a Ct of 37-40. Epidemiologists interviewed at the time said a Ct of around 30 was probably more appropriate. This means the CDC’s COVID-19 test standards for the PCR test would pick up an excessive number of false positives. The Times report noted the CDC’s own data suggested the PCR did not detect live virus over a Ct of 33. The reporter also noted that clinicians were not receiving the Ct value as part of the test results.

Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.

From the NYT article referenced above:

In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90 percent of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said. “I would say that none of those people should be contact-traced, not one,” he said.

Note: I see a lot of criminal conspirators on the Internet calling Principia Scientific "fringe", but the excerpt above references the NYT and peer reviewed research. 

In Closing

PCR testing does not detect virus. It detects molecules that might be associated with a viral infection, such as might be caused by SARS-CoV-2. 

From the CDC:

NAATs [nucleic acid amplification tests - like the RT-PCR] detect one or more viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) genes and indicate a current infection or a recent infection but, due to prolonged viral RNA detection, are not always direct evidence for the presence of virus capable of replicating or of being transmitted to others.

When a person tests positive for SARS-COV-2, the lower  the Ct is the higher the probability that they have an ongoing infection. The higher the Ct for a positive result the lower the probability is for an ongoing infection.

Health authorities must select a Ct value that maximizes the ability to detect those who are likely infected with COVID-19, while avoiding the agenda of selecting a higher value in order to guarantee higher rates of positive cases.

The timing of the test is also important. Ct may be high at the early onset of infection and missing this key piece of data can lead to spread of the virus.

So, how reliable is the PCR test? 

PCR test reliability is highly dependent upon who is doing the testing and the methods and practices they are using.

The PCR test can be used by those who seek to give the color of legitimacy and process to the commission of a fraud. 

But the test is not the problem in such cases. 

The problem is unscrupulous people who have an agenda and will use whatever tools are available to perpetrate it and cover it up.

You can take people who are sick with flu, pneumonia, black plague or whatever and run a PCR test on them with a jacked up Ct and call them COVID positive.

People who have died in car accidents etc are having PCRs run on them and the families never get the body because it is cremated due to being deemed COVID positive. 

In some cases no test at all is done. People are ruled COVID positive on observation alone. This is a travesty, as observable symptoms of COVID can be attributed to any number of ailments. To take away a person's liberty based on this flimsy evidence is a crime.

Such things are being done in the world. People need to educate themselves en masse so that they cannot be railroaded by such practices.

Is Your Adobe Reader Crashing?

 

 

This started happening to me a couple of years ago. I fixed it by creating a rule in Windows Firewall to block AcroRd32.exe from accessing the Internet. 

That works, but there are a lot of other rules in my firewall - so many that sometimes I have to turn it off to make things work that I want to work. 

So, I have started finding more elegant ways of stopping what I want to stop, while allowing other stuff to get through.

This is where I began looking into exactly what is going on.

Using Currports I found that AcroRd32 was trying to access a couple of different IP addresses:

Exploring this on the net reveals that Adobe most often is looking for these two FQDNs (fully qualified domain names):  Acroipm.adobe.com.edgesuite.net and Acroipm.adobe.com.

When you run each one of these through tracert or ping at the command prompt they do indeed turn up our IP addresses from above:

When I plug that first IP (203.177.217.41) into IPNetInfo it does not return Adobe:

Instead it returns the CDN (content delivery network), akamai.net, that is hosting the Adobe service. Same for the other address.

So how do we block Adobe from communicating with these addresses to stop the shutdowns?

We use the hosts file.

You need to open hosts in notepad with admin privileges. The easiest way to do that is open notepad, pin it to the taskbar, close notepad, then right click on it on the taskbar while holding down shift and then select "Run as administrator."

Then you need to open hosts from the file menu of notepad.

You can find the host file on the drive hosting your Windows installation under Windows\System32\drivers\etc

And make sure that you select "all files (*.*)" because the hosts file does not have an extension.

We want to block these Adobe domains using 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 and :: for IPv6 and that looks like this in our hosts file:

Now when Adobe Reader sends a request to the system to resolve either of those two FQDNs the hosts file will block the request, which looks like this:

Adobe Reader is no longer able to reach the two IP addresses that were causing the shutdowns.

What To Do About A Lost COVID-19 Stimulus Payment

The material in this post is not guaranteed to help you rescue your stimulus payment from the bit bucket or thieves or whatever oblivion it may have fallen in to. The IRS sends these checks through normal mail not registered mail so we can expect a good number of them to disappear. 

You can find a lot of information on the IRS website.

NOTE: If the IRS DID NOT send your check then you may be able to claim your stimulus payment as a credit on your taxes. The information described below applies to you only if the IRS DID SEND your check but you did not receive it. 

Table Of Contents

• Updates
  

• Using The IRS Get My Payment Tool

• Call The IRS EIP Hotline

• Was Your Check Returned To The IRS?

• Form 3911

• Economic Impact Payment (EIP) Cards

• Changing Your IRS Mailing Address

UPDATES

I have $8900 that I would not have had I not followed the procedures detailed below. I highly recommend doing the same for anyone who is hesitant about the process. 

July 2020

I Faxed off my Form 3911. I do not know if LBC is operating right now or to what degree they are operational, but that is the method I would use if I had not faxed the doc. LBC will run you about $30, but ordinary postal mail would never make it to the destination. I used an Internet fax company to fax my form. I have used the same company for about ten years and it cost me $0.00 (hint) for the service and works like a charm every time. Do your own research to pick a free fax company. I have ZERO confidence that I will ever see any payout from the IRS. Pity...it would have been $2900 in my case.  

August 2020

Not sure if this is good news yet or not, but it is big news. 

I have been checking the Get My Payment website regularly not expecting anything to have changed. Then today I was greeted with this:

If you log in and click that button this will be the next screen:

I entered my data and the page threw an error that it did not match their records.

I had entered my AGI for 2019 the first time, so I tried my AGI for 2018 and it worked. 

This is the screen you get if you succeed in entering your bank info:

Notice on the first image that the screen says "any future payment," so this issue of the first payment is still not resolved. I need to make a call to follow up, as it has been six weeks since I faxed the 3911.

 

I am not looking forward to that call.  

 

September 2020

 

I called the IRS and told the rep that my check never arrived and that I sent Form 3911 to the IRS three months ago. She said "OK sir, I will transfer you to someone who will help you with that." I was transferred to a recorded message, "We are sorry, but we are not able to take your call at this time due to extremely high call volume...."

 

October 2020

 

I decided to give this one last chance today. I called the EIP hotline again (800-919-9835) and had what at this point I am willing to count as success. The first person I spoke with took my info and transferred me to a specialist. The specialist told me that they were virtually shut down until August so any 3911 sent before then might be...who knows where. The specialist took my information over the phone and filled out a new trace for me. Normally, they require joint filers to fill out the hard copy and fax or mail it in, but the supervisor gave permission to complete the process over the phone. The specialist told me that in 4-6 weeks I would receive either a new check or a packet if the check had been endorsed (as described below). So another waiting game for now.They have my US address on file and they cannot direct deposit it, so it will be another check. I intend to call the local bank where I opened my account and ask them to do me a favor and let me have my mail service mail it to them so they can deposit it. If they cannot do that, the mobile deposit is another option.

NOTICE This is my opinion, but I think it is rooted in fact given the fact that the IRS told me that they cannot direct deposit the check that will be resent. You MUST have a US mailing address for the check to be sent to or else it will just be lost again. Get busy and find a reliable mail forwarding service for yourself if you have not already done so.

 

Give it a shot if you are still waiting.  

 

the call took 47 minutes FYI 

 

November 2020

 

Three  weeks after I called the IRS the money was deposited into my bank account. The agent I had spoken with had told me that the it could not be direct deposited, but fortunately it was.

 

January 2021: Second Round of Checks 

 

The second round of checks started going out in the first week of January 2021. These were for $600. 

 

March 2021: Third Round of Checks 

 

In March 2021 Congress passed legislation containing the third stimulus check. The Senate Parliamentarian did not allow the provision in the legislation creating a $15 per hour minimum wage, stating that it did not meet the rules for budget reconciliation.

The third round of checks began going out in the third week of march, this time for $1400 per individual and each dependent.

Another important provision within that law is expansion of the child tax credit. The previous CTC was $2000. The full $2000 reduces tax liability on a dollar for dollar basis. The refundable portion of the existing credit is up to $1400 after tax liability has been met. The maximum refundable portion in 15% of earned income above $2500. 

The new legislation does away with the earned income requirement and makes the entire credit refundable. The credit is expanded to $3600 for children under 6 and $3000 for children 6 and above, but under 17. Additionally, the credit will be deposited by monthly payments beginning in July 2021. 

I hate socialism, but I say take this money and use it while you can. Use it to prepare, which you should be doing already. No one can look at the national debt, the deficit, the unfunded liabilities, the state of the economies and everything else and not see that we are at the door step of something terrible.

So take the money and use it according to your best judgement. When the government is spending money like there is no tomorrow it might just be because they have intel to that effect. 

Using The IRS Get My Payment Tool 

The following applies only if you already submitted a 2019 tax return. If you did not, then you can still use the non-filers tool.

If you do not have a US bank account then you may be out of luck for direct deposit. The IRS can’t direct deposit money to a foreign account, according to an attorney at the FTC website.

The IRS has done some work on the Get My Payment tool and will now accept the four digit Philippines postal code.

Enter your Social Security #

Enter your birth date

The system will also accept the information of whomever you filed jointly with (I tried it and it works).

When you enter your address it must be exactly as you entered it in your latest tax return.

Then enter your postal code and press enter (and pray that it works).

You may get the message that a check was already sent to your address in which case you will not be able to enter direct deposit information.

Call The IRS EIP Hotline

You can call the IRS Economic Impact Payment Hotline at 800-919-9835. 

You will find that number on the official IRS website.

The wait for a live person may be very long and you will most likely be directed to do one of the things listed below.

If you do call the IRS please be very patient with them. The people at the IRS who are taking calls are not responsible for whatever hardships you may be having. The IRS has undergone simultaneous budget cuts and workload increases, so be understanding with anyone you talk to at the agency.

Was Your Check Returned To The IRS?

The IRS website Stimulus Payment Faq Page under "Payment Status: My payment was mailed weeks ago, but the Post Office was unable to deliver it. What should I do?" this note was added on May 28:

If you have not received your payment within 14 days of the payment date, check Get My Payment periodically. If the IRS receives your payment back because the Post Office was unable to deliver it, we will update your payment status to “Need More Information,” at which point you will be able to enter your bank account information.If you don’t provide your bank account information, the IRS will hold your Economic Impact Payment until we receive your updated address. To update your address please see: Address changes

Form 3911

IRS added this note on June 9 regarding lost payments:

Get My Payment shows that my Payment was issued but I never received it. How do I get a new one? (added June 9, 2020)

If Get My Payment shows your Payment was issued but you have not received it and it has been more than 5 days since the scheduled deposit date (or more than 4 weeks since it was mailed by check (6 weeks if you have a forwarding address on file with the local post office; 9 weeks if you have a foreign address)), you should initiate a trace on your Payment by calling the IRS at 800-919-9835 or you may submit Form 3911. 

 

If you call, please be advised that you may experience long wait times or recorded assistance due to limited staffing. If you submit the form and you are Married Filing Joint, both spouses must sign the form.

 
Note: If a direct deposit, check with your bank before initiating a trace to verify they did not receive the deposit. Do not request a Payment trace if you are trying to determine eligibility for the Payment or the amount of Payment you should have received. You must have been issued Notice 1444 or received a payment date from Get My Payment to perform a trace.

Your claim for a missing Payment is processed one of two ways:

• If the check wasn't cashed, you'll receive a replacement check once the original check is canceled.
  

Note: If you find the original check and receive a replacement, you MUST return the original as soon as possible.

• If the refund check was cashed, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS) will provide you with a claim package that includes a copy of the cashed check. Follow the instructions for completing the claim package. BFS will review your claim and the signature on the canceled check before determining whether they can issue you a replacement check.
  

According to the first paragraph that you should not initiate a trace until 9 weeks have passed (if you have a foreign address) from the date of payment shown in Get My Payment. The first checks were sent out on April 24, so no one should initiate a trace until June 26 at the very earliest.

The process may take several months especially for expats.

How To Fill Out The Form? 

Form 3911 is supposed to for reporting a lost/stolen refund check, so it does not exactly fit the stimulus payment. The advice from the IRS is to fill it out the best you can.

The following is my best guess at filling out Form 3911: 

If you submit the form and you are Married Filing Jointly, both spouses must sign the form

Write “EIP” on the top of the form and complete Sections I, II and III. 

For "in reply to your inquiry on" you can enter the date you contacted the IRS or just the date you downloaded the form.

For "about your Federal tax return for" you can enter "2020 EIP".

For "We sent you the following refund(s)" enter the amount of the stimulus payment in the first space (if known).

In the last line you can enter the date that the check or direct deposit was scheduled if you know it. The Get My Payment tool may show you this information or you may find out from alive person if you call the IRS.

Mark whether it was a check or a direct deposit.

"The U.S. Postal Service returned your check because they could not deliver it" - check it if you know for a fact that this happened, otherwise leave it blank.

"Your check was not cashed within one year of the issue date as the law requires and it can no longer be cashed." does not apply.

"If you did not receive the refund check, or if you received it and it was lost, stolen or destroyed, please complete Sections I, II and III." this is why you came here so check it and move to Section I.

Section I 

Fill out Section I with your information and that of your spouse if you filed joint.

If you are like me and your address changed since you filed, then enter CURRENT ADDRESS here and the address you entered on your return will be entered as shown below.

Make certain that you enter the address exactly as it is on the return.

When completing Number 7 under Section I, check the box for “Individual” as the Type of return and enter “2020” as the tax period and leave the date filed blank. I would leave "Type of refund requested" blank.

Section II

For #8 I would check "I didn’t receive a refund," and then skip to #11 to enter bank information. #11 does not ask for a routing number, but I would enter one just the same along with the account number. 

I would sign off Section III and skip Section IV as it does not apply to a check that I have never seen and for which the IRS can provide me no information.

I intend to include a cover letter with the form explaining all of the details.

Again, we are just taking a shot here. There is no guarantee that this will work, but it is the best option that some people may have at this point. I am going to try it. I intent to send the form through LBC to make sure that it gets to the IRS and fast. This will cost about $30.

The form is to be mailed to the "Internal Revenue Service center where you would normally file a paper tax return." To get the precise answer for exactly where to mail your form you need to go to the IRS website and click the state you entered on your last return or click International. Next click the type of form you used last time around and that should take you to the proper mailing address. For an expat who filed a 1040 that address is:

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Austin, TX 73301-0215
USA

On June 19 the IRS updated instructions for submitting Form 3911. 

• You may now fax the completed form (855-203-7538 if you live in a foreign country).

Even though you put your bank information on the form you may still receive any payment via Economic Impact Payment (EIP) Card (see below). 

Economic Impact Payment (EIP) Cards

The IRS website has added this note about debit cards to its EIP information page:

Mailed Check Payments May Be Sent As Debit Cards. If the Get My Payment application says you’re receiving a check, your Payment may come as a debit card. Debit card Payments come in a plain envelope from “Money Network Cardholder Services."For more information, see Prepaid Debit Cards.

This FAQ was added on June 4 in regard to EIP cards:

A48. Individuals who have lost or destroyed their EIP Card may request a free replacement through MetaBank® Customer Service. The standard fee of $7.50 will be waived for the first reissuance of any EIP Card. Any initial reissuance fee charged to a customer from an earlier date will be reversed. Individuals do not need to know their card number to request a replacement. Individuals may request a replacement by phone at 800-240-8100 (option 2 from main menu).The Economic Impact Payment Card is sponsored by the Treasury Department’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service, managed by Money Network Financial, LLC and issued by Treasury’s financial agent, MetaBank®, N.A. If you receive an Economic Impact Payment Card, it will arrive in a plain envelope from “Money Network Cardholder Services.” The Visa name will appear on the front of the Card; the back of the Card has the name of the issuing bank, MetaBank®, N.A. Information included with the Card will explain that the card is your Economic Impact Payment Card. Please go to EIPcard.com for more information and additional FAQs. 

If you call 800-240-8100,then after language selection you can select #1 for card activation or to speak with customer service. You will not be able to speak with customer service without a card number. 

For a lost or stolen card you will select #2 after language selection. You will then be asked for the last six digits of your social security #. You will then be asked for your zip code. I do not know if this did not work for me because I do not have a card or if they are having the same problem with nonstandard postal codes that the IRS initially experienced.

You can google the card or read about it here: https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/taxes/T054-S001-stimulus-check-payments-by-prepaid-debit-card/index.html

The cards are provided by Meta Bank.

There are fees for some services offered by the cards, but you can have all funds transferred to your bank account at no charge. 

As an expat you may wish to have to have the card sent to your US mail forwarding address. If this is the case then you should have entered that as the first address on the Form 3911.

It is possible that the mail forwarding company can scan the card and your pin, then you can register for an account on the EIP Card site and transfer the balance of the card to your bank account.

Changing Your IRS Mailing Address

See the IRS website for instructions.

The Bottom Line 

I hope that this page can help you to recover your lost payment. 

The worst case is that someone stole and cashed your check or EIP card in which case you will need to follow the instructions for Form 3911 above and complete the claim package that the BFS will send you. Their graphologists are some of the best in the field and they will be able to determine if your handwriting matches the signature on the cashed check. Using this and other tools they will make a determination as to whether to grant you another check. I do not know how long the entire process takes, but I can see it ranging from six months to a year or even more. But eventually, if all goes well, you may get your payment.

It is worth your time to go through this process.