5.12.2020

Scumbag Politician Of The Day: Chuck The Schmuck Schumer

Scumbag Politician Of The Day: Chuck The Schmuck Schumer


Chuck the Schmuck Schumer wants to know why the V.A. is still using hydroxychloroquine. He is puzzled as to why the sham study done by his partisan hack doctor friends did not take hold. They claim that their study showed the drug was ineffective for treatment of COVID-19? Really? No! It was ineffective due to the way in which they used it. They gave it to people who were at death's door and they did not administer it in accordance with the treatment regimen that has shown success in other trials. They got the outcome they wanted - failure. It was a study that was designed to fail. The study itself needs to be looked into for ethical violations in my opinion.

So why is the VA still using hydroxychloroquine? Because it works, Chuck! You partisan schmuck!

Just read through these scores of studies that are ongoing. As with all drugs that WORK there are adverse events. There is a specific regimen that needs to be worked out and adhered to. It is not appropriate for every patient. But hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin/zinc does have a place in the treatment of COVID-19. 

Don't take my word for it. Thousands of doctors all over the world are using hydroxychloroquine as part of their treatment regimen for COVID-19:

A global survey found that anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine was the most highly-rated treatment against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This new survey completed by Sermo on March 27, 2020, reported 6,227 physicians in 30 countries found that 37 percent of those treating COVID-19 patients rated hydroxychloroquine as the “most effective therapy” from a list of 15 options. Also, the survey of 6,227 doctors found that the most commonly prescribed treatments are 56% analgesics, 41% Azithromycin, and 33% Hydroxychloroquine.
Read the SERMO survey results for yourself.

So why the outcry over this drug that has been used for decades when there never was any such outcry before? Because Trump opened his dumb mouth in favor of it. This has triggered a flood of mentally ill people (like Schmucko) who must now counter it at all costs.They know very well that it works and they cannot allow any of its success to be attached to Trump.

What I would like to know is why Chuck the Schmuck is not interested in the fact that almost everyone placed on a ventilator in his state DIES. If Chuck the Schmuck cares so much about people, then why does he not ask that question?  

Chuck the Schmuck's state of New York has the highest COVID-19 death rate ON EARTH: almost  1,400 per million.

Why doesn't Chuck the Schmuck Schumer want answers about that? 

And why does Chuck the Schmuck not ask why Governor Cuomo forced nursing homes in his state to take in COVID-19 positive patients RESULTING IN THE DEATHS OF THOUSANDS OF NURSING HOME PATIENTS IN NEW YORK STATE? THOUSANDS!

At least New York is making a lot of money off of those dead ventilator patients and that is what is really important to Chuck the Schmuck:
According to an analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation, the average medicare payment for a COVID-19 patient is around $13,000. If a patient is on a ventilator for at least four days, Medicare may pay out around $40,000.
Cuomo says that he followed CDC guidelines. Did he? If he did then why is New York such an outrageous outlier? No other state had the same results and they all had the same CDC guidelines. We should just shut up and stop asking questions, right? Heaven forbid that these elitists should have to face tough questions. Let me correct myself...there were a couple of other states with similar outcomes with nursing homes. They are also blue states. Hmmm. 

And why does SENATOR SCHMUCKO not ask GOVERNOR SCHMUCKO why his schmuck brother, Chris, violated quarantine after he tested positive for coronavirus? Chris Cuomo likes to use his CNN bully pulpit to preach bulls#it to all of us, yet he himself violates quarantine spreading the virus to God knows how many people in the process.

Chris Cuomo even threatened the man who questioned his hypocrisy:
In an interview with The New York Post, Mr Whelan said he approached Cuomo and asked why he wasn't social distancing."I said to him, 'Your brother is the coronavirus czar, and you're not even following his rules — unnecessary travel'," he said.Cuomo has been in quarantine and broadcasting from his Southampton home since announcing on 31 March that he had tested positive for coronavirus.
According to Mr Whelan, Cuomo responded: "'Who the hell are you?! I can do what I want!' He just ranted, screaming, 'I'll find out who you are!'""He said, 'This is not the end of this. You'll deal with this later. We will meet again.' If that's not a threat, I don't know what is," Mr Whelan said. 
Chris Cuomo is a SPOILED HYPOCRITE!

The chief weapon of mass distraction of all of the WHO, CCP and insane Marxist US governors, mayors and congress people is that they are all saying "We need to focus on the crisis!," while trying to get us all to ignore the fact that they created and are continuing to aggravate the crisis.

Across America people are revolting against these corrupt and stupid politicians. Even those who voted for them are turning on them. People are opening their eyes to the fact that these criminals are using their constituents as pawns. The criminals think that they can only win by creating the worst possible crisis and then blaming the other side. But people are seeing through it and they are not fooled by the crocodile tears and promises of state income for being good sheep and sitting on their butts at home indefinitely.

But I do also find it odd that Trump and Schmucko agree on most matters of foreign policy, especially in the "Middle East."


UPDATE 6-6-2020

 

The Lancet study that was being touted globally as a death knell  for hydroxychloroquine has been exposed as a deception! 

Lancet has issued a complete retraction:
After publication of our Lancet Article, several concerns were raised with respect to the veracity of the data and analyses conducted by Surgisphere Corporation and its founder and our co-author, Sapan Desai, in our publication. We launched an independent third party peer review of Surgisphere with the consent of Sapan Desai to evaluate the origination of the database elements, to confirm the completeness of the database, and to replicate the analyses presented in the paper.
Our independent peer reviewers informed us that Surgisphere would not transfer the full dataset, client contracts, and the full ISO audit report to their servers for analysis as such transfer would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements. As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process.
We always aspire to perform our research in accordance with the highest ethical and professional guidelines. We can never forget the responsibility we have as researchers to scrupulously ensure that we rely on data sources that adhere to our high standards. Based on this development, we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources. Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted.
We all entered this collaboration to contribute in good faith and at a time of great need during the COVID-19 pandemic. We deeply apologise to you, the editors, and the journal readership for any embarrassment or inconvenience that this may have caused. 
What have I been saying for months about these unscrupulous scientists? The study was rigged. It was just a hit piece in cheap and effective hydroxychloroquine.

And what was the motivation? Money. Hydroxychloroquine off patent and very cheap. Who stood to benefit from the specious study?
In light of these studies, the World Health Organization decided to halt global trials of the drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to treat COVID-19 in order to focus on novel drugs like Gilead's remdesivir. After the studies were retracted, the WHO trials were resumed.

UPDATE 5-29-2020 INDIA TAKES WHO TO TASK ON HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE


ICMR writes to WHO disagreeing with HCQ assessment, officials say international HCQ trial dosages four times higher than Indian trials:
“Internationally in Solidarity trial COVID-19 patients are being administered with–800 mg x 2 loading doses 6 hours apart followed by 400 mg x 2 doses per day for 10 days. The total dosage given to a patient over 11 days is about 9600 mg which is four times higher than the dose we are giving to our patients,” informed the official.This indicates that in our treatment protocol, the efficacy of HCQ is good and patients are recovering quickly with less amount of dosage being administered,” said the official.
The ICMR was too gracious to ask the question, but I will. Is the WHO and the VA purposefully overdosing patients with hydroxychloroquine in order to produce dangerous side effects to destroy the efficacy of this drug for use against COVID-19 and being protected by crooked politicians like Chuck Schumer. Is this all just a sham to prevent the world from using a cheap and effective off patent drug in favor of a mega expensive patented treatment? Are people getting paid by Big Pharma to sabotage the research? Or is the run-of-the-mill incompetence?

India is not part of the China/WHO/Democrat Marxist block that unleashed this plague onto the world.

UPDATE 5-27-2020 Hydroxychloroquine Breakthrough: India


India to increase prophylactic use of hydroxychloroquine due to multiple studies showing its success:

The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), the country’s apex body in the field, has found that consuming the drug hydroxychloroquine reduces the chances of getting infected with Covid-19.As a result, ICMR released an advisory Friday to expand the usage of HCQ — an anti-malarial drug — as a preventive treatment against the novel coronavirus. The conclusion has been drawn on the basis of three studies conducted by the ICMR.
There must not be any DEMOCRATS in India.


No comments:

Post a Comment

If you have comments, corrections or questions we would be happy to hear from you.